Linda Noskova vs Iva Jovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Aug at 04:25 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Noskova vs I. Jovic

CZE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Noskova 0 - 1 Jovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Linda Noskova winning 0 and Iva Jovic winning 2. The last match between Iva Jovic and Linda Noskova was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 10-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Iva Jovic getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Noskova | 0 |
| Jovic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-10-25)
L. Noskova vs I. Jovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,394,479 | Career Prize Money | $959,230 |
| 64.91% (185-100) | Career Total W/L | 72.07% (80-31) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 59.38% (38-26) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.33% (14-10) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
L. Noskova vs I. Jovic Match Preview:
- Second serve success is marginally better for Noskova, with 39.53% of points won compared to Jovic’s 38.38%. Could this give Noskova a slight edge?
- Jovic shows superior performance in return games, winning 50.58% of points on opponents' second serves, while Noskova's rate is slightly lower at 50.18%.
- On first serve returns, Jovic significantly outperforms Noskova, with 33.53% compared to Noskova's 26.41% — a key indicator for favorability in head-to-head encounters.
- Under pressure, Noskova has a better breakpoint saving rate at 50.48%, countered by Jovic's 46.77%.
- Looking at recent match success, Jovic’s win rate of 75.44% is clearly stronger than Noskova's 57.69%, highlighting a dominant year.
- Jovic excels on grass courts (89% win rate), whereas Noskova is most successful on indoor hard courts (76% win rate).
- Jovic tends to compete in lower-tier events (Challengers/ITF) with an impressive 82.5% win rate, while Noskova engages more on the Main tour, holding a 70.37% win rate.
- Noskova faces tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 68.38 compared to Jovic’s 243.88, suggesting a higher playing level.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Jovic is more likely to win, with an 83% success rate compared to Noskova’s 40%.
- Jovic has a better recent breakpoint conversion rate, turning 41.67% of opportunities into breaks against Noskova’s 36.27%.
Editorial Prediction (August 10, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent performance, Jovic's consistent success in matches over the past year reflects a strong competitive edge. Jovic's superior ability in return games, particularly against first serves, emphasizes an advantage when responding to Noskova's serves.
While Noskova plays at a higher event level and saves breakpoints more successfully, Jovic’s dominance in deciding sets and superior breakpoint conversion could dictate the outcome of close games.
Given Jovic's overall match dominance, greater success in pressurized conditions, and notable ability to capitalize on breakpoint opportunities, the prediction leans towards Jovic as the likely winner in the forthcoming match.
Linda Noskova vs Iva Jovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Noskova vs I. Jovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:9:38 | Average Match Time | 1:9:38 |
| 43% (18/42) | 1st Serve % | 47% (24/51) |
| 50% (9/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (18/24) |
| 42% (10/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 74% (20/27) |
| 0% (0/6) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (4/6) |
| 25% (13/51) | Return Points Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Noskova Recent Matches Played
I. Jovic Recent Matches Played

L. Noskova vs I. Jovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.91% (185/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 72.07% (80/31) |
| 61.43% (411/258) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.19% (170/83) |
| 53.20% (3361/2957) | Games Win/Loss | 57.04% (1329/1001) |
| 65.69% (90/47) | Hard Win/Loss | 70.51% (55/23) |
| 57.35% (39/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 73.91% (17/6) |
| 74.58% (44/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 57.14% (12/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 88.89% (8/1) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1144 | Aces Total | 140 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1200 | Total Double Faults | 214 |
| 1:37:19 | Average Match Time | 1:42:24 |
| 261.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.4 |
| 61% (12551/20674) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4409/7188) |
| 67% (8457/12551) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2767/4409) |
| 47% (3819/8123) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1404/2779) |
| 46% (1053/2275) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (484/962) |
| 43% (8756/20318) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3509/7311) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Slam W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 58.33% (28/20) | Masters W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64.84% (59/32) | Main Tour W/L | 77.78% (7/2) |
| 69.74% (53/23) | Challenger W/L | 77.78% (56/16) |
| 72.73% (24/9) | Futures W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 65% (183/282) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (79/109) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (58/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (9/21) |
| 58% (57/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (22/33) |
| 87% (185/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (77/72) |
| 13% (185/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (77/5) |
| 24% (100/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (34/8) |